<- Bromeliaceae Literature (most recent first) — gerhard Zotz

  1. Zotz & Einzmann 2024 (2024/11/22) Werauhia sanguinolenta - A Conspicuous Epiphytic Tank Bromeliad. In: Helene C. Muller-Landau; S. Joseph Wright - The First 100 Years of Research on Barro Colorado: Plant and Ecosystem Science (Volumes 1 and 2). Plant and Ecosystem Science 2: 769-771.
  2. Zotz & Cascante 2024 (2024) Life on the Wire - Plant Growth on Power Lines in the Americas. Diversity 16(9): 1-13 (online).
  3. Reyes et al. 2022 (2022) New Proposal of Epiphytic Bromeliaceae Functional Groups to Include Nebulophytes and Shallow Tanks. 11(22): 1-24 (3151 online).
  4. Taylor et al. 2021 (2021) Vascular epiphytes contribute disproportionately to global centres of plant diversity. bioRxiv 2021.05.21.445115. Web..
  5. Chavez et al. 2019 (2019) Dew Can Prolong Photosynthesis and Water Status During Drought in Some Epiphytic Bromeliads From a Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest. Tropical Conservation Science 12: 1–11.
  6. Müller et al. 2019 (2019) Bromeliaceae subfamilies show divergent trends of genome size evolution. Scientific Reports 9 (5136): 1-12.
  7. Müller et al. 2018 (2018) Growth responses to elevated temperatures and the importance of ontogenetic niche shifts in Bromeliaceae. New Phytologist 217(1): 127-139.
  8. Wagner & Zotz 2018 (2018) Epiphytic bromeliads in a changing world: the effect of elevated CO2 and varying water supply on growth and nutrient relations. Plant Biology 20(3): 636-640.
  9. Müller et al. 2017 (2017) ‘Are 3 °C too much?’: thermal niche breadth in Bromeliaceae and global warming. Journal of Ecology 105(2): 507-516.
  10. Chilpa-Galván et al. 2017 (2017) Drought, post-dispersal seed predation, and the establishment of epiphytic bromeliads (Tillandsia spp.). Biotropica 49(6): 770-773.
  11. Zotz.& Beyschlag 2016 (2016) How common is heteroblasty in Bromeliaceae? A plea for help in finding the answer . Journal of the Bromeliad Society BSI_V65(3): 186-191.
  12. Zotz 2015 (2015) Heteroblasty in bromeliads. In: Benko-Iseppon, A.M.; Alves, M. & Louzada, R. (2015) An overview and abstracts of the First World Congress on Bromeliaceae Evolution. Rodriguésia 66(2): A1-A66. , pp.
  13. Zotz 2013 (2013) A Longer Story Than Expected: Seeds Of Several Species (Tillandsioideae) Remain Viable For Up To Two Years. Journal of the Bromeliad Society 63(1): 83-86.
  14. Zotz 2012 (2012) Ephytic bromeliads and climate change. Die Bromelie 2012(3): 105-109.
  15. Wanek & Zotz 2011 (2011) Are vascular epiphytes nitrogen or phosphorus limited? A study of plant 15N fractionation and foliar N:P stoichiometry with the tank bromeliad Vriesea sanguinolenta. New Phytologist 192(2): 462-470.
  16. Zotz & Asshoff 2010 (2010) Growth in epiphytic bromeliads: response to the relative supply of phosphorus and nitrogen. Plant Biology 12(1): 108-113.
  17. Bader et al. 2009 (2009) Pronounced drought tolerance characterizes the early life stages of the epiphytic bromeliad Tillandsia flexuosa. Functional Ecology 23(3): 472-479.
  18. Zotz 2009 (2009) Growth in the xerophytic epiphyte Tillandsia flexuosa Sw. (Bromeliaceae). Ecotropica 15: 7–12.
  19. Monteiroa et al. 2009 (2009) Tropical epiphytes in a CO2-rich atmosphere. Acta Oecologica 35: 60–68.
  20. Zotz & Richter 2006 (2006) Changes in carbohydrate and nutrient contents throughout a reproductive cycle indicate that phosphorus is a limiting nutrient in the epiphytic bromeliad, Werauhia sanguinolenta. Annals of Botany 97: 745–754.
  21. Zotz et al. 2005 (2005) Long-term population dynamics of the epiphytic bromeliad, Werauhia sanguinolenta. Ecography 28(6): 806-814.
  22. Zotz & Laube 2005 (2005) Tank function in the epiphytic bromeliad, Catopsis sessiliflora. ECOTROPICA 11: 63–68.
  23. Zotz 2005 (2005) Differences in vital demographic rates in three populations of the epiphytic bromeliad, Werauhia sanguinolenta. Acta Oecologica 28: 306–312.
  24. Zotz & Vollrath 2002 (2005) Substrate preferences of epiphytic bromeliads: an experimental approach. Acta Oecologica 28: 306–312.
  25. ZOTZ et al. 2004 (2004) Physiological and anatomical changes during the early ontogeny of the heteroblastic bromeliad, Vriesea sanguinolenta, do not concur with the morphological change from atmospheric to tank form. Plant, Cell & Environment 27(11): 1341-1350.
  26. Zotz et al. 2002 (2002) A Simulation Study on the Importance of Size-related Changes in Leaf Morphology and Physiology for Carbon Gain in an Epiphytic Bromeliad. Annals of Botany 90: 1-7.
  27. Schmidt & Zotz 2001 (2001) Ecophysiological consequences of differences in plant size: in situ carbon gain and water relations of the epiphytic bromeliad, Vriesea sanguinolenta. Plant, Cell & Environment 24(1): 101-111.
  28. Zotz & Thomas 1999 (1999) How much water is in the tank? Model calculations for two Epiphytic Bromeliads. Annals of Botany 83: 183-1992.
  29. Zotz & Andrade 1998 (1998) Water relations of two co-occurring epiphytic bromeliads. Journal of Plant Physiology 152: 545-554.
  30. Zotz & 1997 (1997) Substrate use of three epiphytic bromeliads. Ecography 20(3): 264-270.